

- HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM FOR FREE
- HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM PATCH
- HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM SERIES
- HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM DOWNLOAD
Either way the harmonic spectrum is exactly the same of course.
HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM PATCH
This patch is designed to show you FM with the damper pedal up, and PM with the damper pedal down. Once you start it, put this patch in the patch window and look at the oscilloscope window, which shows you the harmonic spectrum.
HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM DOWNLOAD
You can just download it and run it, you don't need anything extra. It is stand-alone, which means it doesn't work as a DAW plug-in (yet).
HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM FOR FREE
My software is a formula-based modular-style synth and available for free download at.

but it turned out that I was not syncing my software oscilloscope properly, and so on. While I attempted to reproduce your results with my own synth software, I was getting sub-fundamental harmonics on my graph too. In short, Rolf, I'd suggest to check your graphing methodology. I thought I responded yesterday but don't see my response. So, I appologise for this long email and I say thank you very much indeed for the answer I am hoping to get and which I am looking forward to. There are some hundreds of regular visitors of the workshop and I have to find a kind of explanation for the phenomenon, which satisfies at least the “non-mathematical” intentions of my participants. I´m doing a workshop about FM/PM, a workshop for musicians and sound designer, not math freaks (well, I am such a freak, but not the participants). My question at least: Have I overlooked something in the maths? Is there possibly anything different between FM and PM that causes the phenomenon of the “forbidden” partials (I can´t imagine as both are angle modulations)? Or is it a question/problem of coding/programming FM/PM? The results are very similar and the resulting graphs (number of irregular partials against the other mentioned parameters) are similar as well. I´ve made more than 5,000 measurings and I´ve set up the resulting sheets with DEXED, but also with: NI´s FM8, ImageLine´s Sytrus and u-he´s Bazille and the hardware synth Korg Volca FM. Or – I was on the brink of saying “of course” - with both frequencies (carrier and modulator) being constant: the stronger the modulation, the more irregular frequencies. Or with the carrier´s frequency and the modulation strength being constant: the higher the modulator´s frequency the more of these low irregular partials.
HOW TO USE DEXED TO SEND DX7 PATCHES TO VOLCA FM SERIES
I´ve made a series of measuring and found, that the higher the carrier´s frequency at constant modulation strength and constant C:M ratio, the more of these “irregular” frequencies occur. And a last example – returning to more “normal” situations – with fC=1,000 Hz and fM=5xfC and a modulation strength of 88% there is already 1 of these “unexplainable” partials. Or – to point at another extreme constellation - with fC=6,000 Hz, fM=7xfC and modulation strength at 75% there are 4 irregular partials. For example with the carrier´s frequency at 750 Hz and the modulator´s frequency at 30xfC and a modulation strength (output of the modulating oscillator) at 75% there are even 2 lower frequencies in the spectrum. DEXED – irregular frequencies in the FM/PM spectrumĪ heartly “Hello” and big “Thank you” for DEXED!Īccording to the maths of FM/PM of a sine wave by another sine wave there can´t be any frequency lower than the carrier´s frequency in the resulting spectrum, if the modulator´s frequency is twice the carrier´s or higher.īut - given certain circumstances – there are lower frequencies with the described constellation.
